When you can’t quite relate to what someone is going through, empathy can feel risky—like you might say the wrong thing or make it worse. This guide is for those moments. You’ll learn twelve practical, evidence-informed ways to connect with care even when you don’t fully “get it.” These moves help you stay present, avoid assumptions, and support the other person without pretending to agree or rushing to fix.
Quick answer: To show empathy when you don’t understand, name the gap honestly, validate the person’s feelings, and use reflective listening and open questions to rebuild shared meaning—checking your understanding as you go.
Note: This article offers general communication guidance, not medical, legal, or clinical advice.
Quick-start sequence (use when you’re unsure what to do):
- Say you want to understand; 2) Reflect back what you heard; 3) Name the emotion you’re hearing; 4) Ask one open question; 5) Check if you got it right; 6) Ask what would help right now.
1. Say It Plainly: “I Want to Understand—Will You Help Me?”
Start by acknowledging the truth: you don’t fully understand yet, but you want to. This simple transparency lowers pressure on both sides and prevents you from faking agreement or offering premature advice. A direct statement such as, “I’m not sure I fully understand yet, and I really want to—can you tell me more?” signals humility and collaboration. It frames the conversation as a joint effort to build a shared picture, not a quiz where you must already know the answers. When people feel your stance is curious rather than judgmental, they’re more likely to open up and supply the context you’re missing.
This opening also protects the relationship. Pretending to understand can backfire, especially if your later responses reveal you don’t. Naming the gap early sets realistic expectations and invites course-corrections as you go. It also makes space for the other person’s expertise on their own experience—an essential shift when your own frame of reference doesn’t fit. Done well, this move reduces defensiveness, keeps the emotional temperature stable, and positions you to listen more accurately.
1.1 How to do it
- Use first-person language: “I want to understand,” “I don’t want to assume.”
- Pair curiosity with care: “I may not get this right—please correct me.”
- Keep your tone soft and your posture open (uncrossed arms, slight lean-in).
- Invite specifics: “What part was toughest today?” rather than “Why are you upset?”
- End with permission: “Is it okay if I ask a couple of questions?”
1.2 Common mistakes
- Over-apologizing (“I’m a terrible friend”) shifts the focus to you.
- Saying “I understand” as a reflex when you don’t yet.
- Asking “why?” too soon, which can feel interrogating.
Close with a brief, confident restatement—“I’m here to understand, not to judge”—to cement safety.
2. Reflect Back: Paraphrase Feelings and Meaning Before You Add Anything
Empathy lands when people feel heard. Reflective listening—briefly summarizing what you heard and the feelings you picked up—does that. A crisp reflection sounds like, “You’ve worked so hard, and the silence after you shared your idea felt like a slap.” The aim is accuracy, not eloquence. Research on active listening shows that listeners who paraphrase and reflect are perceived as more understanding and satisfying to talk to than those who jump to advice or minimal “mm-hm” acknowledgments.
Open with a clear, one-sentence reflection before asking the next question or offering a thought. Keep it short and tentative (“It sounds like…,” “So, what I’m hearing is…”) to make room for correction. This isn’t a technique to parrot words; it’s a way to test your mental picture against theirs—and revise it fast if you’re off. When someone corrects you, thank them; the correction is progress toward real understanding.
2.1 Mini-checklist
- Content + feeling: include both the facts and the likely emotion.
- Tentative tone: reflections are hypotheses, not verdicts.
- One breath long: keep it short enough to invite immediate correction.
- No sneaky advice: avoid “Have you tried…?” disguised as a reflection.
2.2 Practice stems
- “If I’m tracking this…”
- “The part that stung most was…”
- “Underneath the anger, there’s a lot of disappointment.”
End by inviting adjustment: “What did I miss?” Small revisions often unlock the next layer of the story.
3. Ask One Good Open Question (Then Stop Talking)
When you don’t understand, great questions do more work than great speeches. Open questions—“What was the hardest moment?” “How is this affecting your day-to-day?”—invite fuller stories without steering the person to your preferred explanation. Borrow a page from motivational interviewing’s OARS skills: Open questions, Affirmations, Reflections, and Summaries. Ask one question at a time, then wait; silence is part of the tool.
Resist “stacked” questions (“Was it your boss, or the timeline, or something else?”), which overwhelm and narrow answers. Also avoid “why?” early on; try “What led up to that?” or “What made that tough?” which are less likely to feel accusatory. The goal is to elicit the person’s own reasons, meanings, and priorities, not to extract a confession or build a legal case.
3.1 Useful openers
- “Can you walk me through what happened from your side?”
- “What matters most to you about this?”
- “If we could improve one thing this week, what would help most?”
3.2 Common pitfalls
- Fishing for agreement: “Don’t you think…?”
- Turning the spotlight back to you: “That reminds me of when I…”
- Question avalanches. Ask one, then breathe.
Close by naming something you learned from their answer. It shows you’re tracking and encourages them to keep going.
4. Label the Emotion: Name What You’re Noticing to Help Co-Regulate
A surprisingly powerful way to show empathy is simply to name the emotion you think you’re hearing: “That sounds scary,” “I hear a lot of grief there,” “This is infuriating.” Affect labeling—the act of putting feelings into words—can reduce emotional intensity and help people feel more in control. You’re not diagnosing; you’re offering language that makes the experience more manageable and seen.
When you’re unsure, pair the label with a question: “It sounds overwhelming—does that fit?” If they say, “Not overwhelming—more like numb,” adopt their word immediately. Their vocabulary is the correct one for this conversation. Even a near-miss can be helpful because it invites a clarifying correction that sharpens your shared understanding.
4.1 Mini-checklist
- Keep labels simple: sad, angry, anxious, ashamed, relieved, confused.
- Use “sounds/looks like” to keep the label non-prescriptive.
- Follow with a grounding pause or a slow breath together if emotions swell.
4.2 Micro-examples
- “When you said ‘I can’t do this again,’ your voice got quiet. Is there grief under there?”
- “You keep circling back to how unfair this was. Angry fits?”
Wrap by linking the emotion to the situation: “Given what happened, it makes sense you’d feel cornered.” That pairing is validating without endorsing every interpretation.
5. Validate Without Agreeing: Separate Feelings from Facts and Opinions
Validation communicates, “Your feelings make sense,” even if you see the facts differently or would choose another path. It’s not endorsement; it’s recognizing the internal logic of their emotional response. Statements like, “Given the deadline and the late scope change, it makes sense that you’d feel blindsided,” calm the nervous system and reduce escalation risk. Invalidating messages—“You’re overreacting,” “It’s not a big deal”—tend to spike defensiveness and shut conversations down.
You can validate several things: the emotion (“anyone would be anxious there”), the history (“after last time, this would hit hard”), or the effort (“you’ve really tried to fix this”). When you need to hold a different view, validate first, then explain your perspective: “It makes sense that you’re furious. I also want to share a piece you might not have seen.”
5.1 Validation sentence builder
- Context: “Given X…”
- Emotion: “…it makes sense you feel Y…”
- Reasonableness: “…because Z would be hard for most people.”
5.2 Common mistakes
- “I understand”—without specifics—often lands hollow.
- Validating behavior you can’t support (“You were right to yell”) rather than the emotion.
- Jumping to problem-solving before emotion settles.
Close by asking consent to move forward: “Would you like ideas, or just space to vent a bit more?” Respecting choice is validating, too.
6. Use Teach-Back: “Let Me Check I Got This Right—Can You Tell Me What You Heard?”
When stakes are high or details are complex, practice a short teach-back loop: summarize the key points, then invite the other person to restate what they want you to know or what next step they’re expecting. This isn’t a test; it’s a clarity tool. Try: “Before we figure out next steps, here’s what I think I heard… What’s the most important part, in your words?” Teach-back prevents misinterpretations from hardening into conflict and shows you care enough to get it right.
Keep the loop human. Avoid corporate jargon and keep your summary to 2–4 sentences. If they correct you, start your next sentence with, “Thank you—that helps.” The gratitude reinforces that correction is welcome, not annoying.
6.1 How to run a 60-second teach-back
- Summarize the situation and key feeling.
- Ask them to say the top takeaway in their own words.
- Confirm any requests or boundaries they’ve stated.
- Name the immediate next step and who owns it.
6.2 Mini case
You: “You felt dismissed when the decision changed without you in the room. For now, you want a say in the next plan and a heads-up on changes. Is that right?”
Them: “Yes—and I also want the rationale documented.”
You: “Got it. I’ll draft the rationale today and loop you in for edits.”
Close with a time-bound follow-up so the care carries into action.
7. Mind the Nonverbals: Use Micro-Affirmations, Silence, and Open Posture
When you don’t understand, your body can still communicate respect and care. Micro-affirmations—small, consistent signals like nodding, soft eye contact, and brief “mm” acknowledgments—invite the person to keep sharing. An uncrossed posture, half-step lean-in, and hands visible on the table communicate approachability. Silence is not a problem to solve; it’s white space that lets the other person assemble their thoughts.
Match (don’t mimic) their tempo. If they’re speaking slowly, slow down; if they’re animated, widen your window of tolerance without interrupting. Avoid multitasking and “weaponized” stillness (blank, cold stares). Consider the setting: a quieter corner, sitting rather than hovering, and phones face-down all make empathy easier to feel.
7.1 Micro-affirmation menu
- Brief nods and soft “mm/yeah” while they speak.
- Remembering and using their words (“numb,” “boxed in”).
- Small courtesies—bringing water, offering a tissue, giving time.
7.2 Common misreads
- Over-smiling when they’re upset can feel minimizing.
- Staring intensely can feel invasive; glance away naturally.
- Over-touching; when in doubt, ask, “Would a shoulder squeeze be okay?”
End with a nonverbal wrap—slow exhale, relaxed shoulders—that signals safety and readiness to keep listening.
8. Manage Your Reactivity: Use Mindful Pauses So You Can Stay Present
Empathy collapses when you’re flooded. If you notice tightness in your chest, a rush to fix, or irritation rising, it’s time for a micro-pause. Slow your exhale, drop your shoulders, and name your internal state to yourself (“I’m getting defensive”) so it doesn’t leak out. Mindfulness practices strengthen attention regulation and emotion regulation over time, making it easier to remain steady while someone shares hard things.
You don’t need a meditation cushion in the moment. A ten-second breath—four counts in, six out—quietly calms your nervous system. If you’re too activated to be helpful, set a compassionate boundary: “I want to give this the focus it deserves. Can we pause for ten minutes and come back?” Far better to pause than to push through and say something you’ll have to repair.
8.1 Pocket skills (use in-conversation)
- Label your state silently: “I’m anxious,” “I’m embarrassed.”
- Lengthen your exhale slightly longer than your inhale.
- Soften your gaze; widen peripheral vision to reduce hyperfocus.
8.2 Longer-term supports
- A regular mindfulness or compassion practice (even 10 minutes/day).
- Movement breaks before difficult meetings.
- Brief journaling—“What am I afraid will happen?”—to surface triggers.
Close by re-orienting to purpose: “I’m here to understand you.” Purpose narrows attention back to the person in front of you.
9. Try Safe Perspective-Taking: Steelman Their View Without Slipping Into Assumptions
Perspective-taking is imagining the world from their vantage point. Done well, it reduces stereotyping and softens judgment. The trick is to do it with the other person, not about them. Offer a “steelmanned” version of their position—the most charitable, coherent version you can assemble—and ask if it’s accurate: “If I steelman your view, it’s that X matters more than speed here because Y has burned you before. Is that close?”
Avoid mind-reading specifics you can’t know (“Your boss reminds you of your dad”), which can feel intrusive. Keep it anchored in the facts they’ve given you and the values they’ve named. If they say, “Not exactly,” you haven’t failed; you’ve given them a scaffold to refine.
9.1 Steelman phrasing
- “From your seat, it looks like…”
- “It sounds like the tradeoff is A vs. B, and you’re choosing A because…”
- “What would I miss if I told your story to someone else?”
9.2 Guardrails
- Don’t use perspective-taking to argue covertly.
- Don’t equate understanding with agreement; say so out loud if needed.
- Keep checking: “Am I getting warmer?”
Close by asking for the value underneath: “What value are you protecting here?” Values are empathy shortcuts.
10. Use Culturally Humble Language: Ask About Context, Don’t Project Yours
When your own frame doesn’t fit, cultural humility keeps you from imposing it. Replace assumptions with curiosity about identity, context, and constraints. Try, “Are there any cultural, family, or workplace norms I should know so I don’t make naive assumptions?” Humility is a posture, not a credential: a willingness to self-reflect, notice power dynamics, and repair quickly if you misstep.
Mind the language you use. Some terms carry different meanings across communities; ask for the person’s preferred words. If you get it wrong, correct yourself without making it a drama. Remember that “culture” includes organizational and professional subcultures—engineering teams, clinics, startups—each with its own norms that shape how problems are experienced and discussed.
10.1 Questions that widen context
- “Who else is impacted by this that I may not be seeing?”
- “What expectations are in play here—spoken or unspoken?”
- “How does your background or role change what’s possible?”
10.2 If you misstep
- Acknowledge briefly: “I used the wrong term.”
- Correct: “I’ll use [their term] from here.”
- Refocus: “Back to what matters to you.”
End by confirming autonomy: “You set the terms. How would you like me to support you in this context?”
11. Set Compassionate Boundaries and Use “I” Statements When You Can’t Align
Empathy doesn’t require surrendering your limits. If you can’t do what’s asked—or you see a risk you can’t accept—state your boundary with care and offer the support you can give. “I care about you and I can’t make that promise. I can check in tomorrow and help draft the email.” “I” statements reduce blame and keep the conversation out of a tug-of-war: “I feel stretched and I need to pause before I respond.”
When values diverge, lead with validation (“I see why that matters to you”), then state your “I” need or limit, then propose a collaborative next step. Empathy survives disagreement when both parties feel respected and clear. Ambiguous acquiescence (“Maybe”) spawns resentment; clarity paired with care sustains the relationship.
11.1 Boundary formula
- Care: “I want to help.”
- Limit: “I can’t do X.”
- Offer: “I can do Y.”
- Next step: “Would Z help?”
11.2 Common traps
- Over-explaining your reason (starts a debate).
- Matching volume or sarcasm when emotions spike.
- Silent resentment; say the limit kindly and early.
Close by repeating the care: “I’m on your side, even when I can’t say yes to everything.”
12. Close the Loop: Confirm the Next Step and Follow Up Later
Empathy is felt in the follow-through. Before ending, agree on one concrete next step, who owns it, and when it will happen. Then actually do it. A brief follow-up (“Thinking of you today—still available to listen after 5”) extends care past the conversation and shows you weren’t just performing empathy in the moment.
Don’t over-promise; choose something you can deliver. If the situation is ongoing, schedule a check-in and, if appropriate, summarize decisions or requests in writing to prevent drift. Small, timely follow-ups—sending the resource you mentioned, introducing a contact, asking, “How did that meeting go?”—are micro-affirmations that keep trust growing.
12.1 Mini-checklist
- One action, one owner, one date.
- Short written recap for clarity if decisions were made.
- Calendar a reminder for your follow-up.
12.2 Example wrap
“Today we captured what you need from the team and drafted your request. You’ll send it by 3 p.m.; I’ll review at 4 p.m. I’ll check in tomorrow morning to see how it landed.”
Close by appreciating their trust: “Thanks for letting me in. If I miss the mark, I’ll fix it.” Repair is part of empathy, too.
FAQs
1) What’s the difference between empathy and agreement?
Empathy is understanding and caring about someone’s inner experience; agreement is sharing their conclusions or choices. You can validate that a situation feels frightening or unfair without endorsing every belief or action that follows. In practice, empathy often makes disagreements easier to navigate because it lowers defensiveness and improves the signal-to-noise ratio in hard conversations.
2) Isn’t labeling emotions risky if I get it wrong?
It’s only risky if you present labels as facts. Use a tentative frame (“Sounds like…”) and quickly adopt the person’s own words if they correct you. Even “near-miss” labels can help people clarify what they feel. The goal isn’t diagnosis; it’s co-creating language that fits their experience well enough to move forward.
3) How do I avoid sounding scripted with reflective listening?
Keep reflections short and specific, using their key words. Aim for one sentence that captures the gist and the feeling: “You felt sidelined after investing weeks in this.” Then pause. If you’re tempted to stack three reflections in a row, ask one open question instead. Variety keeps you human.
4) What if open questions make them talk forever and we run out of time?
Set gentle containers up front: “I have 20 minutes and want to give you my full attention. What would be most helpful to cover?” Later, you can say, “I want to honor our time—what’s the one thing you want me to leave with?” Constraints can be caring when named clearly.
5) Can I validate someone if I think their interpretation is inaccurate?
Yes—validate the emotion and the logic given their view: “Given how quickly that happened, it makes sense you felt blindsided.” Later, offer your perspective with consent (“Can I share what I saw from my side?”). Separating feelings from facts lets you be honest and kind simultaneously.
6) What should I do if I feel triggered or overwhelmed?
Use a brief mindful pause—slower exhale, drop your shoulders, soften your gaze. If needed, name a boundary: “I want to hear this fully; can we pause and continue at 3 p.m.?” It’s better to take a restorative break than to push through and risk saying something regrettable. Return when you can be present again.
7) How do I show empathy across cultural differences I don’t understand?
Adopt a humility stance. Ask about context and preferred terms, avoid projecting your norms, and repair quickly if you misstep. Questions like, “Are there any cultural or family expectations I should know to avoid naive assumptions?” widen your lens and signal respect for the person’s lived reality.
8) What if the person keeps asking for solutions I don’t have?
Be honest about your limits while offering the support you can give: “I can’t decide this for the team, but I can help structure your request,” or “I don’t know the answer, but I can connect you with someone who might.” Clarity plus care maintains trust even when you can’t fix the problem.
9) Is teach-back patronizing outside healthcare?
Not if you frame it as your responsibility to get it right: “I don’t want to misquote you—here’s what I heard; what would you add or change?” Teach-back is simply a double-check loop. It’s respectful, fast, and prevents misunderstandings from compounding into conflict.
10) How can I practice these skills without feeling awkward?
Choose one move per week (e.g., ask one open question in each 1:1) and reflect afterward on what changed. Role-play with a trusted colleague. Expect it to feel slightly “new” at first; the goal is responsiveness, not perfection. Over time, the moves become part of your conversational muscle memory.
11) What if the person doesn’t want to talk?
Respect the “no.” You can still show empathy with micro-affirmations and practical offers: “I’m here when you’re ready,” “Would it help if I took the afternoon update?” Forcing a conversation is anti-empathic. Keep the door open without pressure.
12) How do I keep empathy from turning into burnout?
Balance care for others with boundaries and recovery: limit the number of heavy conversations in a day when possible, debrief with a peer, and build small rituals that reset your nervous system—walks, breathwork, journaling. Compassion practices focus on warmth and action, which can replenish rather than drain.
Conclusion
You don’t need to fully understand someone’s experience to be deeply helpful. Empathy in those moments is less about brilliant insights and more about humble, consistent moves: saying you want to understand, reflecting feelings and meaning, asking one good question, labeling emotions gently, validating without endorsing, checking your understanding, and following through. Nonverbal signals, mindful self-regulation, perspective-taking, cultural humility, and respectful boundaries turn those moves into a reliable practice. The payoff is big: fewer misfires, faster de-escalation, and relationships that can handle complexity without splitting.
Pick one or two moves to start. Try them in your next real conversation. Notice what shifts. Then add another tool. Empathy grows through reps, not heroics—and you can begin today.
CTA: Choose one person to check in with this week; use a reflection, an open question, and a 24-hour follow-up.
References
- Rogers, C. R., & Farson, R. E. (1957/2015). Active Listening. Wholebeing Institute (reprint PDF). Wholebeing Institute
- Weger Jr., H., Castle Bell, G., Minei, E. M., & Robinson, M. C. (2014). The Relative Effectiveness of Active Listening in Initial Interactions. International Journal of Listening, 28(1), 13–31. Taylor & Francis. Taylor & Francis Online
- Lieberman, M. D., et al. (2007). Putting Feelings into Words: Affect Labeling Disrupts Amygdala Activity. Psychological Science. UCLA Psychology (PDF). Sanlab
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: OARS Basics (Open Questions, Affirmations, Reflections, Summaries). University of New Hampshire (handout). University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2015). Use the Teach-Back Method (Tool 5). AHRQ
- Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural Humility versus Cultural Competence. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. University of Minnesota (PDF). Medical School
- Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014). Empathy and Compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875–R878. PubMed. PubMed
- Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014). Differential Pattern of Functional Brain Plasticity after Compassion and Empathy Training. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(6), 873–879. Oxford Academic. Oxford Academic
- Hölzel, B. K., et al. (2011). How Does Mindfulness Meditation Work? Proposing Mechanisms of Action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537–559. SAGE Journals. SAGE Journals
- Desbordes, G., et al. (2012). Effects of Mindful-Attention and Compassion Meditation Training on Amygdala Response. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6:292. Frontiers
- Kuo, J. R., et al. (2022). The Who and What of Validation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:888905. National Library of Medicine. PMC
- Rowe, M. (2008). Micro-affirmations & Micro-inequities. MIT Sloan Working Papers. MIT Sloan
- Boston University School of Medicine. (2011). “I” Messages (Handout). bumc.bu.edu
